<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cordless Phone, Portable Wireless Home Phone Blog: Cordless Workz &#187; 5.8ghz cordless phone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cordlessworkz.com/tag/58ghz-cordless-phone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cordlessworkz.com</link>
	<description>The Skinny on Telephones and Consumer Electronics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 14:05:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Why 2.4 ghz or 5.8 ghz Cordless Phones when DECT 6.0 is available?</title>
		<link>http://blog.cordlessworkz.com/2008/12/03/why-2_4-ghz-or-5_8-ghz-cordless-phones/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.cordlessworkz.com/2008/12/03/why-2_4-ghz-or-5_8-ghz-cordless-phones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 18:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cordless Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2.4 ghz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2.4ghz cordless phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5.8 ghz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5.8ghz cordless phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ge 5.8 ghz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panasonic 5.8 ghz digital]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cordlessworkz.com/?p=122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Though 2.4ghz and cordless 5.8 ghz phones have been around for a while, we&#8217;re baffled that these phones continue to be requested.  With the competitive pricing of DECT 6.0 (1.9ghz) in this down economy and the widely number of available models, there really is no reason to consider a 2.4 ghz cordless phone or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center"><img src="http://blog.cordlessworkz.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/crazyphoneman.jpg" alt="" title="crazyphoneman" width="175" height="175" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-261" /></p>
<p>Though 2.4ghz and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.cordlessworkz.com/index.asp?PageAction=VIEWCATS&#038;Category=438">cordless 5.8 ghz</a> phones have been around for a while, we&#8217;re baffled that these phones continue to be requested.  With the competitive pricing of DECT 6.0 (1.9ghz) in this down economy and the widely number of available models, there really is no reason to consider a <a target="_blank" href="http://www.cordlessworkz.com/index.asp?PageAction=VIEWCATS&#038;Category=422">2.4 ghz cordless phone</a> or 5.8 model.  <a target="blank" href="http://www.cordlessworkz.com/index.asp?PageAction=VIEWCATS&#038;Category=579">DECT 6.0</a> solves voice quality deficit and ranges issues that either of the 2.4ghz or 5.8ghz frequency phones have had challenges with.  Ultimately, our DECT 6.0 cordless phone customers have a much lower return rate, which leads us to believe that customer satisfaction is higher with DECT.</p>
<p align="left"><a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Why+2.4+ghz+or+5.8+ghz+Cordless+Phones+when+DECT+6.0+is+available%3F+http://bit.ly/15T6am" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://blog.cordlessworkz.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Why+2.4+ghz+or+5.8+ghz+Cordless+Phones+when+DECT+6.0+is+available%3F+http://bit.ly/15T6am" title="Post to Twitter">Tweet This Post</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.cordlessworkz.com/2008/12/03/why-2_4-ghz-or-5_8-ghz-cordless-phones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
